Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the wp-plugin-hostgator domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/paloktal/palmbeachoceanfrontinn.com/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114

Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the bunyad domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/paloktal/palmbeachoceanfrontinn.com/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home4/paloktal/palmbeachoceanfrontinn.com/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home4/paloktal/palmbeachoceanfrontinn.com/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home4/paloktal/palmbeachoceanfrontinn.com/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home4/paloktal/palmbeachoceanfrontinn.com/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home4/paloktal/palmbeachoceanfrontinn.com/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home4/paloktal/palmbeachoceanfrontinn.com/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home4/paloktal/palmbeachoceanfrontinn.com/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home4/paloktal/palmbeachoceanfrontinn.com/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home4/paloktal/palmbeachoceanfrontinn.com/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home4/paloktal/palmbeachoceanfrontinn.com/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home4/paloktal/palmbeachoceanfrontinn.com/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home4/paloktal/palmbeachoceanfrontinn.com/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home4/paloktal/palmbeachoceanfrontinn.com/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home4/paloktal/palmbeachoceanfrontinn.com/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home4/paloktal/palmbeachoceanfrontinn.com/wp-includes/functions.php:6114) in /home4/paloktal/palmbeachoceanfrontinn.com/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1893
{"id":17861,"date":"2024-03-26T01:48:40","date_gmt":"2024-03-26T01:48:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/palmbeachoceanfrontinn.com\/middle-east-crisis-u-n-security-council-passes-resolution-for-immediate-cease-fire\/"},"modified":"2024-03-26T01:48:40","modified_gmt":"2024-03-26T01:48:40","slug":"middle-east-crisis-u-n-security-council-passes-resolution-for-immediate-cease-fire","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/palmbeachoceanfrontinn.com\/middle-east-crisis-u-n-security-council-passes-resolution-for-immediate-cease-fire\/","title":{"rendered":"Middle East Crisis: U.N. Security Council Passes Resolution for Immediate Cease-Fire"},"content":{"rendered":"


\n<\/p>\n

The United Nations Security Council on Monday passed a resolution calling for an immediate cease-fire in Gaza, breaking a five-month impasse during which the United States vetoed several calls for ending the war, while the humanitarian toll of Israel\u2019s military offensive climbed higher.<\/p>\n

The resolution passed with 14 votes in favor. The United States abstained, allowing the resolution to pass. The chamber broke into applause after the vote.<\/p>\n

\n

\u201cFinally, finally, the Security Council is shouldering its responsibility,\u201d said Algeria\u2019s ambassador to the U.N., Amar Bendjama, the only Arab member of the Council. \u201cIt is finally responding to the calls of the international community.\u201d<\/p>\n

Israel immediately criticized the United States for allowing the resolution to pass. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel\u2019s office called the move \u201ca retreat from the consistent American position since the beginning of the war,\u201d and said the U.S. abstention \u201charms the war effort as well as the effort to liberate the hostages.\u201d<\/p>\n

In response, Mr. Netanyahu said he would not send an Israeli delegation to Washington to hold high-level talks with U.S. officials on a planned operation in the southern Gaza city of Rafah \u2014 a public rebuke to President Biden, who had asked for the meetings.<\/p>\n

A State Department spokesman, Matthew Miller, called that decision \u201ca bit surprising and unfortunate.\u201d<\/p>\n

The United States did not vote for the resolution because it did not condemn Hamas\u2019s Oct. 7 assault on Israel and because of other concerns about the wording, he said at a briefing in Washington. But other aspects of the resolution \u201cwere consistent with our long-term position \u2014 most importantly, that there should be a cease-fire and that there should be a release of hostages, which is what we understood also to be the government of Israel\u2019s position.\u201d<\/p>\n

\n
The Israeli Embassy in Washington on Monday.<\/span>Credit…<\/span>Jim Lo Scalzo\/EPA, via Shutterstock<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n

The breakthrough resolution, which was put forth by the 10 nonpermanent members of the Council, was being negotiated intensely until the last minute. The United States asked for a change in the text that replaced \u201cpermanent cease-fire\u201d in the war between Israel and Hamas with \u201clasting cease-fire,\u201d according to diplomats, and it wanted language calling for both sides to create conditions allowing a halt in fighting to be sustained.<\/p>\n

It calls for a cease-fire for the rest of the holy month of Ramadan, which has two weeks remaining.<\/p>\n

While Security Council resolutions are considered international law and carry significant political and legal weight, the Council does not have the means to enforce them. The Council can take punitive measures such as sanctions against violators, but even that could run into obstacles if a veto-holding member opposes the measure. Israel is currently in violation of a 2016 resolution that demands it stop expanding settlements in the West Bank.<\/p>\n

Over the years, the United States has vetoed dozens of Security Council resolutions critical of Israel; it has rarely abstained, and when it does, analysts say, it marks a clear signal of Washington\u2019s displeasure with Israeli action or policy.<\/p>\n

In 2009, in the final days of the George W. Bush presidency, the United States abstained on a 2009 cease-fire resolution on a previous war in Gaza. Under President Barack Obama, it abstained on the 2016 resolution on West Bank settlements. And it abstained again on a resolution three months ago<\/a> on humanitarian aid for Gaza.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe crucial variable is that the Biden administration is obviously not happy with Israel’s military posture now, and allowing this resolution to pass was one relatively soft way to signal its concern,\u201d said Richard Gowan, an expert on the United Nations at the International Crisis Group. \u201cBut the abstention is a not-too-coded hint to Netanyahu to rein in operations, above all over Rafah.\u201d<\/p>\n

As images of starving children, carnage and vast destruction of civilian infrastructure from Gaza have circulated, global anger has mounted against Israel, along with pressure on the U.S. to reconsider its staunch support of Israel and use its leverage to end the conflict.<\/p>\n

\u201cWhen such atrocities are being committed in broad daylight against defenseless civilians, including women and children, the right thing to do, the only thing to do morally, legally and politically is to put an end to it,\u201d said Riyad Mansour, the Palestinian representative to the United Nations, to the Council.<\/p>\n

\n
Children injured in Israeli bombardment at the al-Najjar hospital in Rafah on Sunday.<\/span>Credit…<\/span>Agence France-Presse \u2014 Getty Images<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n

The resolution adopted on Monday demands the unconditional and immediate release of all hostages, but it does not make its demands for a cease-fire conditional on hostage release \u2014 one of Israel\u2019s stated objections.<\/p>\n

Since the start of the war in October, pressure has been building on the Security Council to call for a cease-fire. Its members, particularly the United States, have been criticized sharply for failing to uphold peace and stability in the world.<\/p>\n

The U.S. ambassador, Linda Thomas-Greenfield, said the adopted resolution fell in line with diplomatic efforts by the United States, Qatar and Egypt to broker a cease-fire in exchange for the release of hostages held in Gaza. She said the U.S. abstained because it did not agree with everything in the resolution, including its failure to condemn Hamas\u2019s Oct. 7 attacks.<\/p>\n

\u201cA cease-fire of any duration must come with the release of hostages \u2014 this is the only path,\u201d Ms. Thomas-Greenfield said.<\/p>\n

The U.S. had vetoed three previous resolutions calling for a cease-fire, agreeing with Israel\u2019s position that it had a right to defend itself and that a permanent cease-fire would benefit Hamas. Those vetoes infuriated many diplomats and U.N. officials as the civilian death toll in the war rose inexorably. The U.S. position also created rifts even with some of its staunch European allies, including France.<\/p>\n

Russia and China then vetoed two alternative resolutions put forth by the United States, the most recent one last Friday, because, they said, those documents did not clearly demand a cease-fire.<\/p>\n

It remained unclear whether Israel or Hamas would heed the resolution\u2019s call for a halt in hostilities.<\/p>\n

Israel\u2019s ambassador to the United Nations, Gilad Erdan, accused the Council of being biased against Israel because it had taken no action on helping secure hostages held captive in Gaza. He said all Council members should have voted \u201cagainst this shameful resolution.\u201d<\/p>\n

\n
Relatives of Israeli hostages held in Gaza at a protest in Jerusalem on Monday during a Purim parade.<\/span>Credit…<\/span>Ronaldo Schemidt\/Agence France-Presse \u2014 Getty Images<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n

The resolution passed on Monday also calls for ensuring access to Gaza for humanitarian aid. It also requires both sides to \u201ccomply with their obligations under international law in relation to all persons they detain.\u201d<\/p>\n

The Oct. 7 Hamas attacks in Israel killed roughly 1,200 people, according to authorities there; about 250 were taken hostage, about half of whom have been released.<\/p>\n

In Gaza, more than 32,000 people have been killed by the Israeli bombardment and ground offensive, a majority of them women and children, the Gazan Health Ministry says. Israel\u2019s airstrikes have also laid waste to vast areas of Gaza.<\/p>\n

The U.S.-backed resolution that failed on Friday also condemned Hamas\u2019s Oct. 7 attack and called for U.N. member states to restrict funding to the Palestinian armed group. The new resolution is far more concise. It deplores \u201call attacks against civilians\u201d and \u201call acts of terrorism,\u201d specifically singling out the taking of hostages.<\/p>\n

Michael Crowley contributed reporting.<\/p>\n